/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) seductive (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: seductive
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignostxt409 - : Abstract:The Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning (Mayer, 2001, 2005) argues that processing joint linguistic and pictorial information results in an integrated mental representation of the message, and that this can both benefit and lessen reading performance, depending on the function of such additions. This study examined the effect of including pictorial representations in an expository text in Spanish that included a tangential but interesting biographical fact (seductive detail). One hundred and forty seven low prior-knowledge participants read the text with the seductive verbal detail in one of three versions: non-illustrated ( Verbal Detail Only condition ), with an image linked to the verbal seductive detail (Seductive Multimedia condition), or with a diagram linked to the main topic of the text (Effective Multimedia condition). Participants’ answers to a title selection task, a free recall task, and a sentence verification task (literal and inferential sentences) were collected.
Evaluando al candidato seductive:
1) detail: 4
3) condition: 3
4) task: 3 (*)
5) verbal: 3 (*)
6) multimedia: 3
seductive
Lengua: eng
Frec: 17
Docs: 3
Nombre propio: 1 / 17 = 5%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 2
Puntaje: 2.984 = (2 + (1+4.08746284125034) / (1+4.16992500144231)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| seductive |
: Garner, R., Gillingham, M. G. & White, C. S. (1989). Effects of seductive details on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 41-57. : Harp, S. F. & Maslich, A. A. (2005). The consequences of including seductive details during lecture. Teaching of Psychology, 32(2), 100-103. : Harp, S. F. & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 414-434. : Lehman, S., Schraw, G., McCrudden, M. T. & Hartley, K. (2007). Processing and recall of seductive details in scientific text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 569-587. : McCrudden, M. T. & Corkill, A. J. (2010). Verbal ability and the processing of scientifictext with seductive detail sentences. Reading Psycholog y, 31(3), 282-300. : Park, B., Moreno, R., Seufert, T. & Brünken, R. (2011). Does cognitive load moderate the seductive details effect? A multimedia study. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 5-10. : Rey, G. D. (2012). A review of research and a meta-analysis of the seductive detail effect. Educational Research Review, 7, 216-237. : Rowland, E., Skinner, C. H., Davis-Richards, K., Saudargas, R. & Robinson, D. H. (2008). An investigation of placement and type of seductive details: The primacy effect of seductive details on text recall. Research in the Schools, 15(2), 80-90. : Schraw, G. (1998). Processing and recall differences among seductive details. Journal of Educational Psycholog y, 90, 3-12. |