Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) relatedness (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: relatedness


Is in goldstandard

1
paper CL_LiteraturayLingüísticatxt353 - : Adicionalmente, los investigadores concluyeron que cada dimensión "made a unique contribution toward explaining variance in the relatedness scores for story events" (Zwaan & Radvansky, 1998:179), es decir, pese a que los efectos de la discontinuidad situacional sería sumativo, estos autores afirman que las dimensiones no estarían conectadas entre ellas .

2
paper corpusSignostxt527 - : ^3Diglossia is defined broadly as “the reservation of highly valued segments of a community’s linguistic repertoire (which are not the first to be learned, but are learned later and more consciously, usually through formal education), for situations perceived as more formal and guarded; and the reservation of less highly valued segments (which are learned first with little or no conscious effort), of any degree of linguistic relatedness to the higher valued segments, from stylistic differences to separate languages, for situations perceived as more informal and intimate” (Fasold, 1984: 53 ).

Evaluando al candidato relatedness:


1) valued: 3
2) segments: 3
3) learned: 3

relatedness
Lengua: eng
Frec: 23
Docs: 13
Nombre propio: / 23 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.774 = ( + (1+3.32192809488736) / (1+4.58496250072116)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
relatedness
: 15. Wolfe, M. B. W., Magliano, J. P., & Larsen, B. (2005). Causal and semantic relatedness in discourse understanding and representation. Discourse Processes, 39(2/3), 165.
: Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148-162. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148
: Johnson, M. K., Bonilla, J. L. & Hermann, A. M. (1997). Effects of relatedness and number of distractors on attribute judgments in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 11, 392-399.
: Keil, F., y Kominsky, J. (2013). Missing links in middle school: Developing use of disciplinary relatedness in evaluating Internet search results. PloS One, 8(6), e67777. [247]https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067777
: Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M., Guez, J. & Kreuger, S. (2005). Divided attention in younger and older adults: Effects of strategy and relatedness on memory performance and secondary task costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32, 520-537.
: Patwardhan, S., Banerjee, S. & Pedersen, T. (2003). Using measures of semantic relatedness for word sense disambiguation. International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (pp. 241-257). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
: Trabasso, Tom y Sperry, Linda. 1985. Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(5), 595-611. [268]https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(85)90048-8
: Wolfe, M. B. W., Magliano, J. P. , & Larsen, B. 2005. Causal and semantic relatedness in discourse understanding and representation. Discourse Processes, 39 (2&3), 165-187.