Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
pragmatics |
: Abdollahzadeh, E. (2010). Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 288-297. : Adams, E. (1983). Probabilistics enthymemes. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, 283-295. : Albalat-Mascarell, A. & Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2019). Self-representation in political campaign talk: A functional metadiscourse approach to self-mentions in televised presidential debates. Journal of Pragmatics, 147, 86-99. : Albelda, M. & Estellés, M. (2018). Introduction to the special issue: Discourse approaches to evidentiality. Pragmatics and Society, 9(3), 333-339. : Albelda, M. & Estellés, M. (en prensa). Mitigation revisited. An operative and integrated definition of the pragmatic concept, its strategic values and its linguistic expression. Journal of Pragmatics. : Albelda, M. (2020). On the mitigating function of the Spanish evidential se ve que. Corpus Pragmatics, 4(1), 83-106. : Allwood, J. (1995). An Activity Based Approach to Pragmatics. Gothenbrug Papers in Theoretical Pragmatics. 76: 1- 38. Gothenburgh: University of Gothenbrug. : Alonso-Almeida, F. (2015a). On the mitigating function of modality and evidentiality. Evidence from English and Spanish medical research papers. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12(1), 33-57. : Alvarez-Cáccamo, C. & Prego-Vázquez, G. (2003). Political cross-discourse: Conversationalization, imaginary networks, and social fields in Galiza. Pragmatics, 13(1), 145-162. : Arroyo, J. (2000). Mire usted Sr. González … Personal deixis in Spanish political-electoral debate. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(1), 1-27. : Arundale, R. (1999). An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory. Pragmatics, 9(1), 119-153. : Atlas, J. D. & Levinson, S. C. (1981). If-clefts, informativeness, and logical form. En P. Cole (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics (pp. 1-61). Amsterdam: Academic Press. : Auwera, J. van der (1997a). Pragmatics in the last quarter century: The case of conditional perfection. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 261-274. : Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). The telling a tale: Discourse structure and tense use in learners’ narratives. Pragmatics and Language Learning, 3, 144-161. : Bernicot, J., Volckaert-Legrier, O., Goumi, A. & Bert-Erboul, A. (2012). Forms and functions of SMS messages: A study of variations in a corpus written by adolescents. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(12), 1701-1715. : Berry, A. (1994). Spanish and American Turn-Taking Styles: A Comparative Study. Pragmatics and Language Learning. Monograph series, 5, 180-190. : Blakemore, D. (2002). Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. : Bolívar, A. (1999). The linguistic pragmatics of political pronouns in Venezuelan Spanish. En J. Verschueren (Comp.), Language and ideology. Selected papers from the 6^th International Pragmatics Conference (pp. 56-69). Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association. : Boxer, D. & Cortés-Conde, F. (1997). From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display.Journal of Pragmatics,27(3), 275-294. : Briz, A. & Estellés, M. (2010). On the relationship between Attenuation, Discourse Particles and Position. En G. Kaltenböck, W. Mihatsch & S. Schneider (Eds.), Studies in Pragmatics 9. New Approaches to Hedging (pp. 289-304). United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing. : Caffi, C. (1999). On mitigation, Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 881-909. : Caffi, C. (2010). Weakening or strengthening?: A Case of Enantiosemy. En G. Kaltenböck, W. Mihatsch & S. Schneider (Eds.), New Approaches to Hedging. Studies in Pragmatics (pp. 181-202). Bingley: Emerald. : Carrera de la Red, M. (2013). Análisis del discurso y sociopragmática histórica en un debate legal en la Cartagena de Indias del siglo XVIII. Intensificación y atenuación como recursos argumentales. Pragmática Sociocultural/Sociocultural Pragmatics, 1(2), 11-45. : Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2019). Authorial engagement in business emails. Engagement in professional genres. In C. Sancho-Guinda (Ed.), Engagement in Professional Genres (pp 48-65). Pragmatics and Beyond New Series. : Carston, R. (2002). Relevance theory and saying/implicating distinction. En L. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics psycholinguistics (pp.101-125). Oxford: Blackwell. : Chien,Y. & Wexler, K. (1990). Childrens knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition, 1(3), 225-295. : Clancy, P. M., Thompson, S. A., Suzuki, R. & Tao, H. (1996). The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(3), 355-387. : Clements, J. C. (1988). The semantics and pragmatics of the Spanish : Cobb-Moore, C., Danby, S. & Farrell, A. (2009). Young children as rule markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1477-1492. : Colston, H. (2001). On necessary conditions for verbal irony comprehension. Pragmatics & Cognition, 8, 277-324. : Colston, H. (2002). Contrast and assimilation in verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 111-142. : Contreras, J. (2008). Conversational silence and face in two sociocultural contexts. Pragmatics, 18(4), 707-728. : Cornish, F. (2008). How indexicals function in texts: Discourse, text, and one neo-Gricean account of indexical reference. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(6), 997-1018. : Crawford, M. (2003). Gender and humor in social context.Journal of pragmatics,35(9), 1413-1430. : Cruse, A. (2000). Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press . : Cuenca, M. & Marín, M. (2012). Discourse markers and modality in spoken Catalan: The case of (és) clar. Journal of Pragmatics , 44, 2211-2225. : Cutting, J. (2015). Dingsbums und so: Beliefs about German vague language. Journal of Pragmatics, 85,108-121. : Czerwionka, L. (2012). Mitigation: The combined effects of imposition and certitude, Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1163-1182. : Dahl, T. (2004). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1807-1825. : Davis, B. H. & Guendouzi, J. (Eds.) (2013). Pragmatics in dementia discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. : DeLancey, S. (2001). The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 369-382. : Dendale, P. & Tasmowski, L. (2001). Introduction: Evidentiality and Related Notions. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), 339-348. : Depraetere, I. (2017). On the pragmatics of modal verbs. Selected papers on theoretical and applied linguistics, 22, 14-26. : Dominiek, S. (2009). Psycholinguistics. En S. Dominiek, J. Ötsman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Cognition and Pragmatics (pp. 288-368). Ámsterdam: John Benjamins. : Drew, P. & Walker, T. (2009). Going too far: Complaining, escalating and disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2400-2414. : Enfield, N. J., Stivers, T. & Levinson, S. C. (2010). Question-response sequences in conversation across ten languages: An introduction. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10), 2615-2619. : Escandell Vidal, V. (2017). Notes for a restrictive theory of procedural meaning: Cognitive, Philosophical, and Sociopragmatic Perspectives. En R. Giora & M. Haugh (Eds.), Doing Pragmatics Interculturally (pp. 79-98). Berlín/Munich/Boston: de Gruyter. : Estellés, M. & Pons, S. (2009). Expressing digression linguistically. Do digressive markers exist? Journal of Pragmatics, 41(5), 931-936. : Estellés, M. (2020). The evolution of parliamentary debates in light of the evolution of evidentials. Al parecer and por lo visto in 40 years of parliamentary proceedings from Spain. Corpus Pragmatics, 1-24. : Fernández, J. (2017). The language functions of tipo in Argentine vernacular. Journal of Pragmatics, 114, 87-103. : Flores-Ferrán, N. (2010). An examination of mitigation strategies used in Spanish psychotherapeutic discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1964-1981. : Fortanet, I. (2004). Enhancing the speaker-audience relationship in academic lectures. In P. Garcés, R. Gómez, L. Fernández & M. Padilla (Eds.), Current trends in intercultural cognitive and social pragmatics (pp. 83-96). Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla. : Fraser, B. (1980). Conversational mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics, 4, 341-350. : Fraser, B. (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, XIV, 219-236. : Fuertes-Olivera, P., Velasco-Sacristán, M., Arribas-Baño, A. & Samaniego Fernández, E. (2001). Persuasion and advertising English: Metadiscourse in slogans and headlines. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1291-1307. : GIVON, T. (1989) Mind, code and context: Essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. : Gallardo, S. (2005a). Pragmatic support of medical recommendations in popularization texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(6), 813-835. : García-Ramón, A. (2018a). Indexing epistemic incongruence: Uy as a formal sign of disagreement in agreement sequences in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 131, 1-17. : Gelabert-Desnoyer, J. (2008). Not so impersonal: Intentionality in the use of pronoun uno in contemporary Spanish political discourse. Pragmatics, 18(3), 407-424. : Gennari, S. (2002). Spanish past and future tenses: Less (semantics) is more. En J. Gutiérrez-Rexach (Ed.), From words to discourse: Trends in Spanish semantics and pragmatics (pp. 21-36). Ámsterdam: Elsevier. : Gibbs, R. (2002). A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 457-486. : Giora, R. & Fein, O. (1999). On understandig familiar and less familiar figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1601-1618. : Giora, R. (2001). Literal vs. figurative language. Different or equal? Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 240-261. : Greco, P. (2018). Evidentiality and epistemic modality in witness testimony in the context of Italian criminal trials.Journal of Pragmatics, 128, 128-136. : Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. En S. Davis (Ed.), Pragmatics: A reader (pp. 305-315). Nueva York: Oxford University Press. : Groenendijk, J. A. & Stokhof, M. J. (1984). Studies on the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers. Tesis de doctorado, Universidad de Ámsterdam, Ámsterdam, Holanda. : Grundy, P. (2008). Doing pragmatics. London: Hodder Education. : Gullberg, M. & Holmqvist, K. (1999). Keeping an eye on gestures. Visual perception of gestures in face-to-face communication. Pragmatics & Cognition, 7, 35-63. : Habermas, J. (1998). On the pragmatics of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. : Hardwood, N. (2005a). Nowhere has anyone attempted ... In this article I aim to do just that. A corpus-based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1207-1231. : Harwood, N. (2009). An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(3), 497-518. : Hay, J. (2001). The pragmatics of humor support. Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, 14(1), 55-82 [en línea]. Disponible en: [109]https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.14.1.55. : Heinemann, T. & Traverso, V. (2009). Complaining in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2381-2384. : Heinz, B. (2003). Backchannel responses as strategic responses in bilingual speakers’ conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(7), 1113-1142. : Hernández Flores, N. (2013). Actividad de imagen. Caracterización y tipología en la interacción comunicativa. Pragmática Sociocultural/Sociocultural Pragmatics, 1(2), 1-24. : Hernández-Flores, N. (2008). Politeness and other types of facework: Communicative and social meaning in a television panel discussion. Pragmatics, 18(4) 577-603. : Holmes, J. (1984). Modifying illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics, 8, 345-365. : Horn, L. (2003). Implicature. En L. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 3-28). Oxford: Blackwell. : Horn, L. R. (2000). From if to iff: Conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 289-326. : Hu, G. & Cao, F. (2011). Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English-and-Chinese-medium journals. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2795-2809. : Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics (Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press. : Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(4), 437455. : Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1091-1112. : Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics, 113, 16-29. : Ifantidou, E. (2005). The semantics and pragmatics of metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(9), 1325-1353. : Ishida, H. (2006). Learners’ perception and interpretation of contextualization cues in spontaneous Japanese conversation: Back-channel cue Uun. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(11), 1943-1981. : Israeli, A. (1997). Semantics and pragmatics of the reflexive verbs in Russian. Slavistische Beiträge. München: Verlag Otto Sagner. : Jefferson, G. & Lee, J. R. E. (1981). The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a troubles-telling and a service encounter. Journal of Pragmatics, 5(5), 399-422. [164]https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(81)90026-6 : Jefferson, G. (2002). Is no an acknowledgment token? Comparing American and British uses of (+)/(−) tokens. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(10-11), 1345-1383. [162]https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00067-X : Jucker, A. H. & Taavitsainen, I. (2013). English Historical pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. : Kachru, B. (1981). The pragmatics of non-native varieties of English. En L. Smith (Ed.), English for cross-cultural communication (pp. 5-39). London: Macmillan. : Kamio, A. (1994). The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(1), 67-100. [166]https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90047-7 : Kita, S. & Ide, S. (2007). Nodding, aizuchi, and final particles in Japanese conversation: How conversation reflects the ideology of communication and social relationships. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(7), 1242-1254. : Kitagawa, C. & Lehrer, A. (1990). Impersonal uses of personal pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 739-759. : Kohnen, T. (2007). Text types and the methodology of diachronic speech act analysis. En S. M. Fitzmaurice & I. Taavitsainen (Eds.), Methods in historical pragmatics (pp. 139-166). Berlín-Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter. : Kolyaseva, A. (2018). The new Russian quotative tipa: Pragmatic scope and functions. Journal of Pragmatics, 128, 82-97. : Kotthoff, H. (2006). Gender and humor: The state of the art.Journal of pragmatics,38(1), 4-25. : Kress, G. (1989). History and language: Towards a social account of language change. Journal of Pragmatics, 13, 445-66. : Kronmüller, E. & Barr, D. J. (2007). Perspective-free pragmatics: Broken precedents and the recovery-from-preemption hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(3), 436-455. : Laforest, M. (2009). Complaining in front of a witness: Aspects of blaming others for their behavior in multi-party family interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2452-2464. : Lazard, G. (2001). On the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 359-367. : Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman. : Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. : Lorenzo-Dus, N. & Bou-Franch, P. (2013). A cross-cultural investigation of email communication in Peninsular Spanish and British English: The role of (in) formality and (in) directness. Pragmatics and Society, 4(1), 1-25. : Maalej, Z. (2013). Framing and manipulation of person deixis in Hosni Mubarak’s last three speeches: A cognitive-pragmatic approach. Pragmatics, 23(4), 633-659. : Maitland, K. & Wilson, J. (1987). Pronominal selection and ideological conflict. Journal of Pragmatics, 11(4), 495-512. : Martinovski, B. (2006). A framework for the analysis of mitigation in courts: Toward a theory of mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(12), 2065-2086. [173]https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.08.006 : Menéndez, S. M. (2017b). Agentivity: Verbs classification from a discursive point of view. Ponencia presentada en el XV International Conference of the International Pragmatics Association. International Pragmatics Association, Belfast, Irlanda. : Mihatsch, W. (2010). The diachrony of rounders and adaptors: Approximation and unidirectional change. En G. Kaltenböck, W. Mihatsch & S. Schneider (Eds.), New Approaches to Hedging. Studies in Pragmatics 9 (pp. 93-122). United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing. : Montero-Fleta, B., Montesinos-López, A., Pérez-Sabater, C. & Turney, E. (2009). Computer mediated communication and informalization of discourse: The influence of culture and subject matter. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(4), 770-779. : Morris, T. (1998). Topicity vs. thematicity: Topic prominence in impromptu Spanish discourse. Journal of pragmatics, 29, 93-203. : Mur Dueñas, P. (2011). An intercultural analysis of metadiscourse features in research articles written in English and in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3068-3079. : Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10, 135. : Myers, G. (1992). "In this text we report..." Speech acts and scientific facts. Journal of Pragmatics, 17, 295-313. : Myers, G. A. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 1-35. : Newton, K. (1995) "Metacognition and consciousness" en Pragmatics & Cognition Vol. 3(2), John Benjamins Publishing Co. (pp. 285-297). : Noveck, I. (2018). Experimental pragmatics: The making of a cognitive science. Cambridge University Press. : Noveck, I. A. & Reboul, A. (2008). Experimental pragmatics: A Gricean turn in the study of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 425-431. : Noveck, I. A. & Sperber, D. (2004). Experimental pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. : Nuyts, J. (2001). Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), 383-400. : Oliveira, S. M. (2013). Address in computer-mediated communication. In S. C. Herring, D. Stein & T. Virtanen (Eds.). Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication (pp. 291-314). Berlin/Boston: Gruyter Mouton. : Overstreet, M. (2011). Vagueness and hedging. En G. Andersen & K. Aijmer (Eds.), Pragmatics of Society (pp. 293-317). Berlín, De Gruyter. : O’Keefe, A., Clancy, B. & Adolphs, S. (2011). Introducing pragmatics in use. London: Routledge. : Panther, K. & Thornburg, L. (1997). A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 755-769. : Papafragou, A. & Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics pragmatics interface. Cognition, 86(3), 253-282. : Parodi, G., Julio, C., Nadal, L. & Burdiles, G. (2018). Always look back: Eye movements as a reflection of anaphoric encapsulation in Spanish while reading the neuter pronoun ello. Journal of Pragmatics, 132, 47-58. : París, L. (2006). Implicating and focusing on underspecifed lexical information. En K. von Heusinger & K. Turner (Eds.), When semantics meets pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier. : Plungian, V. (2001). The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), 349-357. : Prince, E. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. En P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 223-255). New York: Academic Press. : Pérez Hernández, L. & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2002). Grounding, semantic motivation, and conceptual interaction in indirect directive speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 259-284. : Qin, W. & Uccelli, P. (2019). Metadiscourse: Variation across communicative contexts. Journal of Pragmatics, 139, 22-39. : Ravelli, L. J. (1988). Grammatical metaphor. An initial analysis. En E. Steiner & R. Veltman (Eds.), Pragmatics, discourse and text. Some systemically-inspired approaches (pp. 133-147). Londres: Pinter Publishers. : Reilly, J., Zamora, A. & McGivern, T. (2005). Acquiring perspective in English: The development of stance. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 185-208. : Reinhart, T. (1982). Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 27, 53-94. : Ruiz de Mendoza, F. & Baicchi, A. (2007). Illocutionary constructions: Cognitive motivation and linguistic realization. In I. Kecskes & L. Horn (Eds.), Explorations in pragmatics: Linguistic, cognitive, and intercultural aspects (pp. 95-128). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. : Sadock, J. M. (1981). Almost. En Peter COLE (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics (pp. 257-272). Nueva York: Academic Press. : Santibáñez, C. (2010). Metaphors and argumentation: The case of Chilean parliamentarian media participation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(4), 973-989. : Sbisà, M. (2001). Illocutionary force and degrees of strength in language use. Journal of Pragmatics , 33, 1791-1814. : Schwenter, S. (1999). Exclusivity and conditional marker form I: Adversative contexts. En S. Schwenter (Ed.), Pragmatics of Conditional Marking: Implicature, Scalarity and Exclusivity (pp. 117-230). Nueva York: Garland Pub. : Schwenter, S. (1999). Pragmatics of conditional marking. Nueva York: Garland. : Shaw, P. & Vassileva, I. (2009). Co-evolving academic rhetoric across culture; Britain, Bulgaria, Denmark, Germany in the 20^th century. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(2), 290-305. : Sidnell, J. (2012). Who knows best? Evidentiality and epistemic asymmetry in conversation. Pragmatics and Society, 3(2), 294-320. : Sifianou, M. (2012). Disagreements, face and politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1554-1564. : Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (2002). Pragmatics, Modularity and Mind-reading. Mind and Language, 17, 3-23. : Spooren, W. & Sanders, T. (2008). The acquisition order of coherence relations: On cognitive complexity in discourse. Journal of pragmatics, 40(12), 2003-2026. : Stein, N. (1982). The definition of a story. Journal of pragmatics North-holland publishing company, 6, 487-507. : Tadros, A. (1993). The pragmatics of text averral and attribution in academic texts. En M. Hoey (Ed.), Data, Description, Discourse. Londres: Harper Collins. : Tao, H. & Thompson, S. A. (1991). English backchannels in Mandarin conversations: A case study of superstratum pragmatic ‘interference’. Journal of Pragmatics, 16(3), 209-223. : Thaler, V. (2012). Mitigation as modification of illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 907-919. : Tian, Y. & Breheny, R. E. (2018). Pragmatics and negative sentence processing. Oxford University Press. : Traugott, E. C. (2019). Whither historical pragmatics? A cognitively-oriented perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 25-30. : Uclés, G. (2020). Epistemic (a)Symmetries and Mitigation in the Description of Conversational Markers: The Case of Spanish ‘¿no?’ Corpus Pragmatics, 4(1), 107-131. [200]https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-019-00068-7 : Uclés, G. (en prensa). Mitigation and boosting as face-protection functions. Journal of Pragmatics. : Urban, G. (1988). The pronominal pragmatics of nuclear war discourse. Multilingua, 7(1-2), 67-93. : Van Dijk, T. (1981). Sentence topic and discourse topic. En T. van Dijk, Studies in the pragmatics of discourse (pp. 177-193). París: Mouton. : Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. Londres: Edward Arnold. : Verstraete, J. C. (2001). Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(10), 1505-1528. : Verstraete, J. C. (2005). Scalar quantity implicatures and the interpretation of modality. Problems in the deontic domain. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(9), 1401-1418. : Vine, B. (2009). Directives at work: Exploring the contextual complexity of workplace directives. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(7), 1395-1405. : Vázquez Carranza, A. (2017). Some uses of ‘no’ in Spanish talk-in-interactions. International Review of Pragmatics, 9, 1-24. : Ward, N. & Tsukahara, W. (2000) Prosodic features which cue Back-Channel responses in English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language Studies, 32(8), 1177-1207. : Ward, N. (2006). Non-Lexical conversational sounds in American English. Pragmatics and Cognition, 14(1), 113-184. : White, P. (2002). Appraisal: The language of evaluation and stance. En J. Verschueren, J. Östman, J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 1-27). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. : White, P. R. R. (2011). Appraisal. En J. Zienkowski, J. O. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Discursive pragmatics (pp. 14-36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. : Whitt, R. (2011). (Inter)Subjectivity and evidential perception verbs in English and German. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 347-360. : Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. (2002). Relevance theory. En L. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics Psycholinguistics (pp. 34-78). Oxford: Blackwell. : Wodak, R. (1995). Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis. En J. O. Varscheueren, J-O Östman & J. Blommart (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 204-210). Ámsterdam: John Benjamins. : Wodak, R. (2007). Pragmatics and critical discourse analysis. A cross-disciplinary enquiry. Pragmatics & Cognition, 15(1), 203-225. : Young, R. (1996). Intercultural communication: Pragmatics, genealogy, deconstruction. Clevedon: Multilingual Maters Ltd. : Ziegeler, D. (2000). What almost can reveal about counterfactual inferences. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1743-1776. : Ziegeler, D. (2010). Running the gauntlet on the approximatives debate: A response to recent challenges. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 681-704. : Zondervan, A. (2009). Experiments on QUD and focus as a contextual constraint on scalar implicature calculation. En U. Sauerland & K. Yatsushiro (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics: From experiment to theory (pp. 94-112). Houndmills (Basingstoke): Palgrave Macmillan. : Zupnik, Y. (1994). A pragmatic analysis of the use of person deixis in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 339-383. : de Swart, H. E. (2007). A cross-linguistic discourse analysis of the perfect. Journal of pragmatics, 39(12), 2273-2307. : van Dijk, T. (1977 Text and context. Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse, London: Longman. |