Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) lexicon (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: lexicon


Is in goldstandard

1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines359 - : Generative lexicon and lexicographic applications: The medical concrete nouns in the dictionary of the Real Academia Española

2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines359 - : Lenci, A. (2001). Building an Ontology for the Lexicon: Semantic types and word meaning . En P. Jensen & P. Skadhauge (Eds.), Ontolog y-Based Interpretation of Noun Phrases. Proceedings of the First International OntoQuery Workshop (pp.103-120). Kolding: Department of Business Communication and information Science, University of Southern Denmark. [ [39]Links ]

3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines408 - : El presente estudio corresponde a un diseño experimental de medidas repetidas que permitió comparar el efecto de LI y LEV en el aprendizaje léxico con la utilización de las tareas de reconocimiento visual y categorización semántica. Se utilizaron 28 seudopalabras (p. ej., balter, gink) que fueron seleccionadas a partir de una serie de criterios en la página de The English Lexicon Project (http://elexicon .wustl.edu) (Balota, Yap, Hutchison, Cortese, Kessler, Loftis, Neely, Nelson, Simpson & Treiman, 2007). Estos incluían longitud (4-6 letras), vecindad ortográfica (6-11 vecinos ortográficos), frecuencia de bigrama promedio (2.036-3.802), y tiempos de reacción (655-1050ms) y precisión (0.17-0.97) en tareas de decisión léxica. Al mismo tiempo, se seleccionaron otras 42 seudopalabras equivalentes a las utilizadas en el experimento que cumplían la función de distractores en los ejercicios de vocabulario de la condición LEV. Las 28 seudopalabras que los sujetos debían aprender se repartieron en

4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines500 - : Lexicon: English

5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines500 - : Of the different modules that constitute FunGramKB, it is the Lexicon and the Grammaticon that we will be focusing on in this research study. We will be specifically revising one of the attributes in the core grammar component in the Lexicon which has to do with the inventory of argumental constructions in which verbs can take part: L1- constructions .^[63]^5 The notion of construction, which is directly linked to the Grammaticon module (where constructional schemata are stored in different Constructicon modules), needs to be clearly and unequivocally defined in FunGramKB, as Periñán-Pascual himself highlights: “A key issue in this module [Grammaticon] is the definition of ‘construction’” (Periñán-Pascual, 2013: 213).

6
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines500 - : n pounded the nail flat into the wall. Similarly, ^[71]Fumero and Díaz (2017) support this theoretical assumption and claim that the term ‘kernel construct’ should be restricted to those structures listed in the Lexicon, which would allow us to establish the difference with ‘non-kernel constructions’, which are “stored and described in the form of constructional schemata” (^[72]Fumero & Díaz, 2017: 36 ) at the different levels of the Construction within the Grammaticon.

7
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines510 - : The aim of this paper is to determine which noun classes may function as resumptives in Spanish syntax, which are their lexical properties and in which way the relation is established between the resumptive noun and the head of the relative clause. Assuming that resumption may involve several categories, relational and part-whole nouns are analyzed in terms of the Generative Lexicon Theory put forth in Pustejovsky (1991, 1995, 1998): lexical representations, hierarchically structured, account for the information which classifies the noun as either relational or part-whole denoting and which enables the noun to function as resumptive if its Qualia Structure allows for an agreement relation with the antecedent . Similarities between the two noun classes are established, some data is presented regarding their syntactic behaviour and context-sensitive lexical representations are proposed in order to provide a theoretical explanation of the information allegedly encoded within the lexical entry

8
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines510 - : De Miguel, E. (2012). Properties and internal structure of the lexicon: Applying the Generative Lexicon Model to Spanish . En M. Sanz & J. M. Igoa (Eds.), Applying Language Science to Language Pedagogy: Contributions of Linguistics and Psycholinguistics to Second Language Teaching (pp. 165-200). Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. [ [188]Links ]

Evaluando al candidato lexicon:


1) noun: 6 (*)
2) lexical: 4 (*)
4) seudopalabras: 3 (*)
5) generative: 3 (*)
7) grammaticon: 3 (*)

lexicon
Lengua: eng
Frec: 135
Docs: 51
Nombre propio: 6 / 135 = 4%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 5
Puntaje: 5.658 = (5 + (1+4.32192809488736) / (1+7.08746284125034)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
lexicon
: “the actual description of each of the constructional patterns in which a verb can enter and a pointer in the Lexicon to lead the parser to the description of these constructions in the Grammaticon” (^[78]Fumero & Díaz, 2017: 37).
: Aitchison, J. 1994. Words in the Mind. An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. 2. ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
: Almeida, M. & Vidal, C. (1995). A sociostylistic variation in the lexicon: A contrastive study. Boletín de Filología, 35, 49-65.
: Asher, N. & Pustejosky, J. (2013). A type composition Logic for Generative Lexicon. En J. Pustejovsky, P. Bouillon, H. Isahara, K. Kanzaki & C. Lee (Eds.), Advances in Generative Lexicon Theory (pp. 39-66). Nueva York / Londres: Springer.
: Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B. & Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445-459.
: Bassano, D., Maillonson, I. & Eme, E. (1998). Developmental changes and variability in early lexicon: A study of French children's naturalistic production. Journal of Child language, 25, 493-531.
: Borer, H. (2003). Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations: Syntactic projections and the lexicon. En J. Moore & M. Polinsky (Eds.), The nature of explanation in linguistic theory (pp. 31-67). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
: Busa, F., Calzolari, N. & Lenci, A. (2001). Generative Lexicon and the SIMPLE model: Developing Semantic Resources for NLP. En P. Bouillon & F. Busa (Eds.), The language of word meaning (pp. 333-349). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Busa, F., Calzolari, N., Lenci, A. & Pustejovsky, J. (2001). Building a semantic lexicon: Structuring and generating concepts. En H. Bunt, R. Musken & E. Thijsse (Eds.), Computing Meaning (pp. 29-51). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
: Church, K., Gale, W., Hanks, P. & Hindle, D. (1991). Using statistics in lexical analysis. En U. Zernik (Ed.), Lexical Acquisition: Exploiting on-line resources to build a lexicon (pp. 115-64). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
: Clark, E. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Faber, P. & Mairal, R. (1999). Constructing a lexicon of English verbs. Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter.
: Fillmore, C. & Atkins, B. T. (1992). Towards a frame-based lexicon: The case of RISK. En A. Lehrer & E. Kittay (Eds.), Frames and Fields (pp. 75-102). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
: Fillmore, C. (2006). The articulation of lexicon and constructicon. Plenary talk at the Fourth International Construction Grammar Conference (pp. 53-63). University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
: Fillmore, Ch. & Atkins, S. (1992). Towards a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of risk and its neighbors. En A. Lehrer & E. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, Fields and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization (pp. 75-102). Hilldale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
: Geiger, O. (1999). Metaphors and the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 68, 190-198.
: González, M. & Maldonado, R. (2007). Extensiones pragmáticas de la contraexpectación. Balance, reformulación y réplica. En I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, C. Inchaurralde & J. Sánchez (Eds.), Language, Mind and the Lexicon (pp. 123-142). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
: Harley, H. & Noyer, R. (2000). Licensing in the non-lexicalist lexicon. En B. Peeters (Ed.), The Lexicon/Encyclopaedia Interface (pp. 349-374). Ámsterdam: Elsevier.
: Heine, L. (2014). Models of the bilingual lexicon and their theoretical implications for CLIL. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 225-237.
: Hindmarsh, R. (1980). The Cambridge English lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Ingria, R. J. P & George, L. M. (1993). Adjectives, nominals, and the status of arguments. En J. Pustejovsky (Ed.), Semantics and the Lexicon (pp. 107-127). Dordrecht/Boston/Londres: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
: Kipper, K. (2005). VerbNet: A broad-coverage, comprehensive verb lexicon. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Pensilvania, Philadelphia, Estados Unidos.
: Kipper, K., Trang Dang, H. & Palmer, M. (2000). Class-based construction of a verb lexicon. En R. Engelmore & H. Hirsh (Eds.), The 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 691-696). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
: Kircher, K., Smith, M. C., Lockhart, R. S., King, M. L. & Jain, M. (2010). The bilingual lexicon: Language-specific units in an integrated network. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23(4), 519-539.
: Mairal, R. & Periñán, C. (2009). The anatomy of the lexicon component within the framework of a conceptual knowledge base. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 22, 217-244.
: Marantz, A. (1997). No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. En A. Dimitriadis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(2), 201-225.
: Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L., Waksler, R. & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 3-33.
: Mel’čuk, I. (1996). Lexical functions: A tool for the description of lexical relations in a lexicon. In L. Wanner (Ed.), Lexical functions in lexicography and natural language processing (pp. 37–102). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Johm Benjamins.
: Mervis, C.B. (1983). Acquisition of a lexicon. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 210-236.
: Miikkulainen, M., & Dyer, M. (1991). Natural language processing with modular PDP networks and distributed lexicon. Cognitive Science, 15, 345-399.
: Moravcsik, J. (2001). Metaphor, creative understanding and the Generative Lexicon. En P. Bouillon & F. Busa (Eds.), The language of word meaning (pp. 247-261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Murphy, L. M. (2003). Semantic relations and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Nagy, W., Anderson, R., Schommer, M., Scott, J. & Stallman, A. (1989). Morphological families in the internal lexicon. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 263-282.
: Pustejovsky, J. & Batiukova, O. (2018). Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
: Pustejovsky, J. & Jezek, E. (2016). Integrating Generative Lexicon and Lexical Semantic Resources [en línea]. Disponible en: [134]http://lrec2016.lrec-conf.org/media/filer_public/2016/05/10/tutorialmaterial_pustejovsky.pdf
: Pustejovsky, J. (1991). The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics, 17(4), 409-441.
: Pustejovsky, J. (1995) The generative lexicon. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
: Pustejovsky, J. (2013). Type theory and lexical decomposition. En J. Pustejovsky, J. Bouillon, P. Isahara, H. Hanzaki & C. Lee (Eds.), Advances in Generative Lexicon Theory (pp. 9-38). Nueva York: Springer.
: Ramchand, G. (2008). Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Ruimy, N. (2006b). A computational multi-layered italian lexicon for hlt applications. En Proceedings XII EURALEX International Congress, Atti del Congresso Internazionale di Lessicografia,1, 221-227.
: Rumshisky, A., Grinberg, V. & Pustejovsky, J. (2007). Detecting selectional behavior of complex types in text. Conferencia presentada en 4th International Workshop on Generative Lexicon, Ministère de la Recherche, París, Francia.
: Sanches, C., Routier, A., Colliot, O. & Teichmann, M. (2018). The structure of the mental lexicon: What primary progressive aphasias reveal. Neuropsychologia, 109, 107-115.
: Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1998). The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. En P. Ca-rruthers & J. Boucher (Eds.), Language and thought. Interdisciplinary themes (pp. 184-200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Trueswell, J. (2000). The organization and use of the lexicon for language comprehension. En B. Landau, J. Sabini, J. Jonidis & E. Newport (Eds.), Perception. cognition and language. Essays in honor of Henry and Lila Gleitman (pp. 327-345). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
: Van Valin, R. & Mairal, R. (2014). Interfacing the lexicon and an ontology in a linking system. In M. A. Gómez González, F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & F. Gonzálvez-García (Eds.), Theory and practice in functional-cognitive space (pp. 205-228). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Waksler, R. (1999). Cross-linguistic evidence for morphological representation in the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 68, 68-74.