/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) deontic (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: deontic
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines532 - : “The deontic type of authority is a right to exercise command or to influence, especially concerning rulings on what should be done in certain types of situations, based on an invested office, or an official or recognized position of power” (nuestra traducción: “El tipo de autoridad deóntica es un derecho a ejercer el mando o influir, especialmente en lo que respecta a las decisiones sobre lo que se debe hacer en ciertos tipos de situaciones, sobre la base de una posición de poder oficial o reconocida” ).
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines598 - : Finally, event modality expresses an attitude towards the information provided and is divided into deontic modality and dynamic modality, which are related to meanings of obligation and ability respectively, among others. In the case of deontic modality, ^[74]Hoye (1997: 43 ) includes devices entailing “necessity of acts in terms of which the speaker gives permission or lays an obligation for the performance of actions at some time in the future”. The category of dynamic modality is included as a part of ^[75]Palmer’s event modality, in which deontic modality is incorporated. Palmer (2001: 10) believes that “dynamic modality relates to ability or willingness”. This is what we generally refer to as the skills, abilities and/or capacities one person or one object may have to carry out one action, such as in ‘Peter the translator can render this into English’, where ‘can’ expresses that the necessary conditions are met so that the action may be done. ^[76]Nuyts (2001) defines dynamic modality
3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines598 - : Necessity is another value of deontic modals in conclusions. ^[140]Charlow (2016) mentions the traditional division of modals according to necessity into weak and strong necessity modals. The form ‘should’ would be categorised as a weak necessity modal, and the modal form ‘must’ would correspond to the group of strong necessity modals. The author states, however, that a strong necessity modal does not exist, and she is “inclined to treat strong deontic necessity as a special case of weak deontic necessity” (Charlow, 2016: 47 ). The notion of ‘betterness’ seems to apply well to explain the modal sense of necessity. The following examples have been taken from our corpus:
Evaluando al candidato deontic:
1) necessity: 9
2) modality: 8 (*)
3) dynamic: 4 (*)
5) modal: 4 (*)
6) weak: 3
deontic
Lengua: eng
Frec: 27
Docs: 5
Nombre propio: / 27 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 3
Puntaje: 4.009 = (3 + (1+4.85798099512757) / (1+4.8073549220576)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| deontic |
: Beller, S. (2010). Deontic reasoning reviewed: psychological questions, empirical findings, and current theories. Cognitive Processing, 11, 123-132. : Charlow, N. (2016). Decision theory: Yes! Truth conditions: No! In N. Charlow & M. Chrisman (Eds.), Deontic modality (pp. 47-81). Oxford: Oxford University Press . : Piqué-Angordans, J., Posteguillo, S. & Andreu-Besó, J. V. (2002). Epistemic and deontic modality: A linguistic indicator of disciplinary variation in academic English. LSP & Professional Communication, 2(2), 49-65. : Verstraete, J. C. (2005). Scalar quantity implicatures and the interpretation of modality. Problems in the deontic domain. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(9), 1401-1418. |