Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
written communication |
: Bazerman, C. (2001). Nuclear information: One rhetorical moment in the construction of the information age. Written communication 18:3, 259-295. : Berkenkotter, C. & Huckin, T. (1993). Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication, 10(4), 475-509. : Cherry, R. D. (1988). Ethos versus persona: Self-representation in written discourse. Written communication, 5, 251-276. : Coffin, C. (2004). Learning to write history: The role of causality. Written communication, 21(3), 261-289. : Concha, S. & Paratore, J. (2011). Local coherence in persuasive writing: An exploration of Chilean students’ metalinguistic knowledge, writing process, and writing products. Written Communication, 28(1), 34-69. : Crismore, A., Markkanen, R. & Steffensen, M. S. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10, 39-71. : Crossley, S. A., Roscoe, R. & McNamara, D. (2014). What is successful writing? An investigation into the multiple ways writers can write successful essays. Written Communication, 31(2), 184-214. : Crossley, S. A., Weston, J. L., Sullivan, S. T. M. & McNamara, D. S. (2011). The development of writing proficiency as a function of grade level: A linguistic analysis. Written Communication, 28(3), 282-311. Doi: 10.1177/0741088311410188 : Crossley, S., Muldner, K. & McNamara, D. (2016). Idea generation in student writing: Computational assessments and links to successful writing. Written Communication, 33(3), 328-354. : Finn, S. (1995). Measuring effective writing. Cloze procedure and anaphoric “This”. Written Communication, 12(2), 240-266. : Flower, L. & Hayes, J. (1984). Images, plans, and prose. The representation of meaning in writing. Written Communication, 1, 120-160. : Flower, L. y J. Hayes (1981b) Plans that guide the composing process. En C. Fredriksen y J. Dominic (eds.), Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication, Vol. 2. Hove, Sussex and Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 39-58. : Flower, L. y J. Hayes (1984) Images, plans and prose: The representation of meaning in writing. Written Communication, 1, 120-60. : Geisler, Ch., Kaufer, D. S. & Steinberg, E. R. (1985). The unattended anaphoric “This”. When should writers use it? Written Communication, 2(2), 129-155. : Hanauer, D. I. (2015). Measuring voice in poetry written by second language learners. Written Communication, 32(1), 66-86. : Haswell, R. H. (2005). NCTE/CCCC's recent war on scholarship. Written Communication, 22(2), 198-223. : Higgins, L., Flower, L. & Petraglia, J. (1992). Planning text together: The role of critical reflection in student collaboration. Written Communication, 9(1), 48-84. : Hyland, K. (1996b). Talking to the academy forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication, 13(2), 251-281. : Hyland, K. (2001). Bringing in the reader. Addressee features in academic articles. Written Communication, 18(4), 549-574. : Luzón, M. J. (2013). Public communication of science in blogs: Recontextualizing scientific discourse for a diversified audience. Written Communication, 30(4), 428-457. [216]https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313493610 : McDonald, S. P. (1992). A method for analysing sentence-level differences in disciplinary knowledge making. Written Communication, 9(4), 533-569. : McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A. & McCarthy, P. M. (2010). Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication, 27(1), 57-86. Doi: 10.1177/0741088309351547 : Nystrand, M. (1986). The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers. Orlando, Fl.: Academic Press. : Nystrand, M. (1989). A social interactive model of writing. Written Communication, 6, 6685. : Nystrand, M. Greene, S. & Wiemelt, J. (1993) Where did Composition Studies Come From? Written Communication, 10, 3, 267-333. : Ratteray, O. (1985). Expanding roles for summarized information. Written Communication, 2(4), 457-472. : Rundbald, G. (2007). Impersonal, general, and social: The use of metonymy versus passive voice in medical discourse. Written Communication, 24(3), 250-277. : Russell, D. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity Theory Analysis. Written Communication, 14(4), 504-54. : Uccelli, P. Dobbs, C. L. & Scott, J. (2013). Mastering academic language: Organization and stance in the persuasive writing of high school students. Written Communication, 30(1), 36-62. DOI: 10.1177/0741088312469013 : Witte, S. (1992) Context, text, intertext: Toward a constructivist semiotic of writing. Written Communication, 9, 237-308. : vande Kopple, W. (1998). Relative clauses in spectroscopic articles in the physical review. Written Communication,15(2), 170-202. |