/LING

Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) linguistic theory (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

---

1) Candidate: linguistic theory

Is in goldstandard

---

1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines575 - : Marrero, V. & Aguirre, C. (2003). Plural acquisition and development in Spanish. En S. Montrul & F. Ordóñez (Eds.), Linguistic theory and language development in hispanic languages: Papers from the 5th linguistics symposium and the 4th conference on the acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese (pp . 275-296). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. [ [142]Links ]

Evaluando al candidato linguistic theory:

linguistic theory
Lengua:
Frec: 39
Docs: 27
Nombre propio: 1 / 39 = 2%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.158 = ( + (1+0) / (1+5.32192809488736)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)

linguistic theory

: Aissen, J. (2003). Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 21, 435-483. : Arad, M. (2003). Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: The case of Hebrew denominal verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 737- 778. : Bednarek, M. (2008). Semantic preference and semantic prosody re-examined. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 4(2), 119-139. : Bonet, E. (1995). Feature structure of Romance clitics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 13, 607-647. : Borer, H. (2003). Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations: Syntactic projections and the lexicon. En J. Moore & M. Polinsky (Eds.), The nature of explanation in linguistic theory (pp. 31-67). Stanford: CSLI Publications. : Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. En R. Freidin, P. Otero & M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud (pp. 133-166). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. : Corpas Pastor, G. (2016). Collocations dictionaries for English and Spanish: The state of the art. En A. Orlandi & L. Giacomini (Eds.), Defining collocations for lexicographic purposes: From linguistic theory to lexicographic practice (pp. 173-208). Frankfurt: Peter Lang. : Davidse, K. (1996). Ditransitivity and possession. En R. Hasan, D. Butt & C. Cloran (Eds.), Functional descriptions: Linguistic form and linguistic theory (pp. 85-144). Amsterdam: Benjamins. : Diesing, M. (1990). Verb movement and the subject position in Yiddish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 8(1), 41-79. : Downing, A. (1996). The semantics of get-passives. En R. Hasan, D. Butt & C. Cloran (Eds.), Functional descriptions: Linguistic form and linguistic theory (pp. 179-205). Amsterdam: Benjamins. : Fernández-Montraveta, A. & Vázquez, G. (2014). The SenSem Corpus: An annotated corpus for Spanish and Catalan with information about aspectuality, modality, polarity and factuality. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 10(2), 273-288. : Fillmore, C. J. (1967). The case for case. En E. Bach & R.T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory (pp. 1-88). Nueva York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. : Firth, J. (1968). A sinopsis of linguistic theory. En F. Palmer (Ed.), Selected papers of J.R. Firth 1952-59 (pp. 168-205). London: Indiana University Press. : Haegeman, L. (1988). The categorial status of modals and L2 acquisition. En S. Flynn & W. O´Neil (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 252-276). Boston: Kluwer. : Halliday, M. A. K. (2013). Putting linguistic theory to work. En J. J. Webster (Ed.), The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, Volume 11: Halliday in the 21st Century (pp.124-142). Londres: Bloomsbury. : Harris, J. (1996). The morphology of Spanish clitics. In H. Campos & P. Kempchinsky (Eds.), Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Carlos Otero (pp. 168-197). Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press. : Jackendoff, R. (1987). The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic inquiry, 18(3), 369-411. : Leckie-Tarry, H. (1995). Language and Context: A Functional Linguistic Theory of Register. London: Frances Pinter. : McCloskey, J. & Hale, K. (1984). On the syntax of person-number inflection in modern Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1(4), 487-533. : Melchuck, I. (1986). Semantic bases of linguistic description (Meaning-Text linguistic theory). En M. Marino & L. Pérez (Eds.), The Twelfth LACUS Forum. Lake Bluff: LACUS. : Oyelaran, O. (1967). Aspects of linguistic theory in Firthian linguistics. Word, 23, 428-452. : Sauerland, U. & Stateva, P. (2007). Scalar vs. epistemic vagueness. En M. Gibson & T. Friedman (Eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory. Ithaca: CLC Publications . : Shuy, W. R. (Ed.) (1977). Linguistic theory: GAT can it say about reading? Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association. : Staroverov, P. (2007). Relational nouns and reciprocal plurality. En T. Friedman & M. Gibson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Semantics and Linguistic Theory conference (pp. 300-316). Nueva York: Cornell University. : Swart, H. (1998). Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 347-385. : Tenny, C. & Pustejovsky, J. (2000). A history of events in linguistic theory. En C. Tenny & J. Pustejovsky (Eds.), Events as grammatical objects (pp. 1-37). Standford: CSLI Publications. : de Swart, H. (1998). Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 347-385.