Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) evaluative (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: evaluative


Is in goldstandard

1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines282 - : The present study attempts to explore expressions of interpersonal meaning more systematically, drawing on SFL theory. The metafunctional nature of this theory not only provides a systematic means for differentiating interpersonal meaning from ideational and textual meanings, but also for exploring how they relate to each other. Within SFL, Appraisal offers the theorization of interpersonal meaning choices in discourse (see Martin, 2000; Martin & Rose, 2003, 2007; Hood, 2004; Hood & Martin, 2005; Martin & White, 2005). A central concept of Appraisal theory is that speakers of a language use evaluative resources "for negotiating our social relationships, by telling our listeners or readers how we feel about things and people (in a word, what our attitudes are)" (Martin & Rose, 2003:19 ). The focus of analysis of this study deals with one of the Appraisal systems outlined by these authors -Engagement, which includes "all the resources by which the textual or authorial voice is positioned

2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines282 - : [...] a comprehensive map of appraisal resources that we could deploy systematically in discourse analysis, both with a view to understanding the rhetorical effect of evaluative lexis as texts unfold, and to better understanding the interplay of interpersonal meaning and social relations in the model of language and the social we were developing, especially in the area of solidarity (Martin, 2000: 148 ).

3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines282 - : It is noteworthy that a large number of non-integral citations was identified, showing some degree of heteroglossia, as a resource for grading up the value of a proposition. However, they were not considered in our analysis because they may be regarded as slightly evaluative in the genre, and in particular in the disciplines under analysis . Though profusely used by writers, the purpose of including this type of citation seems to constitute an attempt to build up on consensual disciplinary knowledge rather than engage in dialogism.

4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines283 - : The present study attempts to explore expressions of interpersonal meaning more systematically, drawing on SFL theory. The metafunctional nature of this theory not only provides a systematic means for differentiating interpersonal meaning from ideational and textual meanings, but also for exploring how they relate to each other. Within SFL, Appraisal offers the theorization of interpersonal meaning choices in discourse (see Martin, 2000; Martin & Rose, 2003, 2007; Hood, 2004; Hood & Martin, 2005; Martin & White, 2005). A central concept of Appraisal theory is that speakers of a language use evaluative resources "for negotiating our social relationships, by telling our listeners or readers how we feel about things and people (in a word, what our attitudes are)" (Martin & Rose, 2003:19 ). The focus of analysis of this study deals with one of the Appraisal systems outlined by these authors -Engagement, which includes "all the resources by which the textual or authorial voice is positioned

5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines283 - : [...] a comprehensive map of appraisal resources that we could deploy systematically in discourse analysis, both with a view to understanding the rhetorical effect of evaluative lexis as texts unfold, and to better understanding the interplay of interpersonal meaning and social relations in the model of language and the social we were developing, especially in the area of solidarity (Martin, 2000: 148 ).

6
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines283 - : It is noteworthy that a large number of non-integral citations was identified, showing some degree of heteroglossia, as a resource for grading up the value of a proposition. However, they were not considered in our analysis because they may be regarded as slightly evaluative in the genre, and in particular in the disciplines under analysis . Though profusely used by writers, the purpose of including this type of citation seems to constitute an attempt to build up on consensual disciplinary knowledge rather than engage in dialogism.

7
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines417 - : The semantic prosody of a lexical item is commonly classified in three different categories: positive, negative and neutral. Other evaluative labels have been used in the literature: favourable and unfavourable, desirable and undesirable, pleasant and unpleasant . Indeed, Xiao and McEnery (2006: 108) point out that:

8
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines427 - : Problem solving as evaluative academic genre: Rhetoric organization and use of multimodal devices

9
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines480 - : * T. Aha. (SS: Making evaluative comments, SF: Affective scaffolding )

10
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines577 - : A salient finding was the recurrence of VPs containing modals and semi-modals such as poder (can), deber de (must), necesitar (need), tener que (have to), verbs with modal meanings that act as modal auxiliaries in Spanish, such as pretender (seek), querer (want to), proponerse (aim to) as well as periphrastic modals such as ir a (be about to) (^[107]De Kock & Gómez Molina, 2002; ^[108]Parodi, 2015). These various VPs specify the meaning of the accompanying infinitive verb and denote epistemic possibility, prediction and volition. Additionally, these verb structures, that embed dependent finite and non-finite clauses and/or phrasal and clausal coordination, create an elaborate discourse style, which is highly explicit in meaning. At times, accompanied by evaluative markers emphasising the need for funding:

11
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines586 - : Evaluative resources and dynamics in Spanish: The discourse of collective memory in post-dictatorship Argentina

12
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines598 - : After this clarification, and turning again to the definitions of modality presented above, we highlight in all of them the evaluative and qualifying use of the proposition that the modal particle accompanies to make it more precise. Thus, the speaker’s perception according to that proposition is captured in the modal form used to express, for example, obligation or probability. This evaluative dimension of modality implies that its analysis can be framed within what are called perspective studies or, in English, stance, as noted by ^[49]Alonso-Almeida (2015a: 2):

Evaluando al candidato evaluative:


1) martin: 12
3) interpersonal: 8
4) appraisal: 8 (*)
5) resources: 7
7) discourse: 6 (*)
9) modal: 4 (*)
10) hood: 4
11) systematically: 4
13) rose: 4
14) textual: 4 (*)
15) understanding: 4 (*)
18) genre: 3 (*)
19) meanings: 3

evaluative
Lengua: eng
Frec: 82
Docs: 29
Nombre propio: 1 / 82 = 1%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 6
Puntaje: 6.972 = (6 + (1+6.16992500144231) / (1+6.37503943134693)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
evaluative
: “the global potential of language for making evaluative meanings, e.g. for activating positive/negative viewpoints, graduating force/focus, negotiating intersubjective stance” (^[60]Martin & White, 2005: 164).
: Bednarek, M. A. (2004). Evaluating the world: The evaluative style of British broadsheet and tabloid publications. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Augsburgo, Augsburgo, Alemania.
: Bondi, M. (2017). What came to be called: Evaluative what and authorial voice in the discourse of history. Text & Talk, 37, 25-46.
: Channell, J. (1999). Corpus-based analysis of evaluative lexis. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 38-55). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Fortanet, I. (2008). Evaluative language in peer review referee reports. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 27-37.
: Humos, O. A. (2012). An evaluative analysis of comprehension questions’ level of difficulty: A case of 12th Grade Palestinian English Student’s Textbook. An -Najah Univ. J. Res, 26(3), 667-688.
: Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2005) Evaluative ‘that’ constructions. Signalling stance in research abstracts. Functions of Language, 12(1), 39-63.
: Lemke, J. (1998). Resources for attitudinal meaning: evaluative orientations in text semantics. Functions of Language, 5(1), 33-56.
: Mauranen, A. (2003). Evaluative language use in academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 269-271.
: Oteíza, T. (2009a). Evaluative patterns in the official discourse of Human Rights in Chile: Giving value to the past and building historical memories in society. Delta, 25, 609-640.
: Thompson, G. & Zhou, J. (2001). Evaluation and organization in text: The structuring role of evaluative disjuncts. En S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 121-140). Oxford: Oxford University Press .
: Xuanwei, P. (2008). Evaluative meanings in literary texts. The first step towards appraisal stylistics. En N. Nørgaard (Ed.), Systemic Functional Linguistics in Use Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication (pp. 665-684). Denmark: University of Southern Denmark.