/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) argumentative (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: argumentative
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines388 - : Argumentative strategies in young children: An study of disputes during play in school contexts
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines435 - : This paper seeks to highlight the importance for teaching of writing in the vocational training of their own ‘argumentative devices’ of different professional fields. It is considered that the discursivities of these areas involve different ways of conceptualizing data, to link the particular with the general and to answer specific problem that challenges them. While these ways of conceptualizing are no strangers to the semiotic tools, especially verbal and iconic, they can be thought as pre-discursive and that they give rise to argumentative guiding devices which are explained finally in their own genres of such practices, with the deployment of the appropriate rhetorical strategies. In this work, the ‘argumentative devices’ are illustrated as of examples from four professional practices, characterized by centrally exercised through discursive production: they are assumed by psychoanalysts, priests, lawyers and journalists . Regulatory provisions governing professional discursivities are
3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines574 - : Recio, I., Nadal, L. & Loureda, Ó. (2018). On argumentative relations in Spanish: Experimental evidence on the grammaticalization of cause-consequence discourse markers . Discourse Markers in Grammaticalization and Constructionalization: New Issues in the Study of Language Change. Brill, Leiden. [ [158]Links ]
4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines594 - : All the student participants were informed of the purpose of the study before the commencement of the study, and expressed willingness to participate in the study. Three students who took both the expository and argumentative writing courses under the instructor were selected for an in-depth exploration in this study considering ethical issues and sample representativeness . They were willing to share their thoughts and their relevant written documents. Moreover, they were similar to the other students in the class and in larger EFL contexts as they believed that writing is largely a grammar-based activity. Thus, they were representative of the whole class and of larger EFL contexts, further justifying their selection as participants in the study. In addition, they had never encountered SFL through any reading material prior to the study, and they had never experienced receiving any relevant teacher-written feedback. These three female students were given the pseudonyms Elizabeth, Bella, and
5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines594 - : 3.4. Students’ transition to the writing of argumentative essays: Temporary collapse and ultimate alignment
6
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines594 - : First two argumentative essays Ideational meaning: The students mechanically and constantly used show as the reporting verb rather than changing it according to the strength of the evidence . This involves the students’ interpretation of evidence, which sometimes amounted to a logical fallacy (e.g., they did not take the research context into consideration and made a hasty generalization). Ideational meaning: Is the reporting verb appropriate for expressing the meaning of the original text? Does the research really say so or suggest so? Can you double-check the logic between the evidence and your interpretation?
Evaluando al candidato argumentative:
5) professional: 3
argumentative
Lengua: eng
Frec: 107
Docs: 41
Nombre propio: 1 / 107 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.387 = ( + (1+2) / (1+6.75488750216347)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| argumentative |
: Akiguet, S. & Piolat, A. (1996). Insertion of connectives by 9- to 11-year-old children in an argumentative text. Argumentation, 10, 253-270. : Arcidiacono, F. & Bova, A. (2011). Argumentative strategies for conflict management and resolution in Italian and Swiss families. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1385-1389. : Baker, M. (1999). Argumentation and constructive interaction. En Pierre Coirier & Jerry Andriessen (Eds.), Studies in writing. Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp. 179-202). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press. : Bova, A. & Arcidiacono, F. (2013b). Investigating children’s Why-questions. A study comparing argumentative and explanatory function. Discourse Studies, 15(6), 713-734. : Bova, A. & Arcidiacono, F. (2014a). You must eat the salad because it is nutritious. Argumentative strategies adopted by parents and children in food-related discussions at mealtimes. Appetite, 73, 81-94. : Bova, A. & Arcidiacono, F. (2014b). Types of arguments in parents-children discussions: An argumentative analysis. Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata/Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics, 14(1), 43-66. : Bova, A. & Arcidiacono, F. (2015). Beyond conflicts. Origin and types of issues leading to argumentative discussions during family mealtimes. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3(2), 263-288. : Bova, A. & Arcidiacono, F. (2018). Interplay between parental argumentative strategies, children’s reactions, and topics of disagreement during mealtime conversations. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 19, 124-133. : Brumark, Å. (2008). Eat your hamburger! - No, I don’t want to! Argumentation and argumentative development in the context of dinner conversation in twenty Swedish families. Argumentation, 22(2), 251-271. : Eemeren, F. Van y Grootendorst, R. (1994b) "Analysing argumentative discourse", en Eemeren, F. Van y Grootendorst, R. (Comps.) Studies in Pragma-Dialectic, Amsterdam: Sic Sat: International Centre for the Study of Argumentation : Feltrim, V. D., Teufel, S., das Nunes, M. G. V. & Aluísio, S. M. (2006). Argumentative zoning applied to critiquing novices’ scientific abstracts. In J. Wiebe & Y. Qu (Eds.), Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications (pp. 233-246). Dordrecht: Springer. : Goodwin, C. (2006). Retrospective and prospective orientation in the construction of argumentative moves. Text & Talk, 26(4-5), 443-461. : Hyland, K. (1990). A genre description of the argumentative essay. RELC Journal, 21(1), 66-78. : Jenkins, H. H. & Pico, M. L. (2006). SFL and argumentative essays in ESOL. Proceedings of the 33 International Systemic Functional Congress, Sao Paulo, Brazil. : Lee, J. J. & Deakin, L. (2016). Interactions in L1 and L2 Undergraduate Student Writing: Interactional Metadiscourse in Successful and Less-Successful Argumentative Essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 33(C), 21-34. : Mercier, H. & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do human reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 57-74. : Micheli, R. (2010). Emotions as objects of argumentative constructions. Argumentation, 24, 1-17. : Piolat, A., Roussey, J.Y. & Gombert, A. (1999). Developmental cues of argumentative writing en J.E.B. En J.E.B. Andriessen & P. Coirier (Eds.), Foundations of argumewntative text processing (pp. 117-135). Ámsterdam: Universitiy Press. : Plantin, C. (1998). Les raisons des émotions. En M. Bondi (Ed.), Forms of argumentative discourse / Per un'analisi lingüistica dell'argomentare (pp. 3-50). Bologne: CLUEB. : Van Eemeren, F. & Houtlosser, P. (1999). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Discourse Studies, 1, 479-497. : Van Eemeren, F. & Houtlosser, P. (2008). Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse: Exploring the boundaries of reasonable discussion. En F. van Eemeren, D. Cratis & I. Zagar (Eds.), Understanding Argumentation (pp. 13-26). Amsterdam: Sic Sat-Rozenberg. : Van Eemeren, F. (2010). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Extending the pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. : Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S. & Jacobs, S. (1993). Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Alabama: The University of Alabama Press. : When the students moved to argumentative writing in the second semester, notable issues emerged regarding the nuanced differences between genres, which posed challenges for the students in terms of their alignment with the online resources. As Mary recalled: : Yang, W. & Sun, Y. (2012). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education, 23, 31-48. : Zadunaisky Ehrlich, S. & Blum-Kulka, S. (2010). Peer talk as a ‘double opportunity space’: The case of argumentative discourse. Discourse Society, 21(2), 211-233. : van Eemeren, F. & Garssen, B. (2010). In varietate concordia - United in diversity: European parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type. Controversia, 7(1), 19-37. : van Eemeren, F., Houtlosser, P. & Snoeck Henkemans, F. (2007). Argumentative indicators in discourse. A pragma-dialectical study. Dordrecht: Springer. |